<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puck Prospectus Reference Page</title>
	<link>http://www.hockeyprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=70</link>
	<description>Everything Else is Fluff.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Baseball Prospectus &#124; Unfiltered</title>
		<link>http://www.hockeyprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=70#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hockeyprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=70#comment-15</guid>
					<description>[...] Responding to a challenge from Christina, Keith posted the best and worst outfield arms for 2006. Keith took a look at the criterion of preventing runners advancing from second on a single but of course there are other scenarios one could include. Recently, John Dewan published a similar metric in The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2007 that included all advancement scenarios on singles and doubles. The top and bottom five outfields by his measure were: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Responding to a challenge from Christina, Keith posted the best and worst outfield arms for 2006. Keith took a look at the criterion of preventing runners advancing from second on a single but of course there are other scenarios one could include. Recently, John Dewan published a similar metric in The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2007 that included all advancement scenarios on singles and doubles. The top and bottom five outfields by his measure were: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
