Home Unfiltered Articles Stats Glossary
Baseball       
Hockey Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

2013 NHL Entry Draft - Top draft prospects list and analysis

<< Previous Article
Howe and Why (07/13)
<< Previous Column
Up and Coming (07/07)
Next Column >>
Up and Coming (07/19)
Next Article >>
Up and Coming (07/19)

July 15, 2010
Up and Coming
Pucks From the Past- The Montreal Canadiens Rule

by Iain Fyffe

Printer-
friendly

Prior to the 1956-57 NHL season, league General Managers voted (by a count of five to one) to adopt a new rule, which now forms part of rule 16.2, but at the time was rule 26(c), reading as follows:

    26(c) If while a Team is “short-handed” by one or more minor or bench minor penalties, the opposing Team scores a goal, the first of such penalties shall automatically terminate.

This was known informally as the “Montreal Canadiens rule”, and indeed Montreal management was the only party to oppose adoption of the rule. It was called this because the Habs at the time had a reputation of having a deadly power-play, and of frequently scoring more than once on the same minor penalty. Presumably the other teams were growing tired of Montreal scoring so many goals on them, and decided to do something about it.

The issue likely came to a head starting on November 5, 1955, when the Bruins visited Montreal. Boston took a two-goal lead in the first period, but then center Cal Gardner took a penalty with 10 seconds left in the period. Sixteen seconds into the second period, defenseman Hal Laycoe took another penalty. The Habs pounced. Man-advantage monster Jean Beliveau took full advantage, recording a natural hat trick with goals at 0:42, 1:08 and 1:26 of the second, with all three goals assisted by Bert Olmstead. Le Gros Bill then added a fourth goal (at even strength) in the third period to seal a 4-2 Montreal victory.

If the Bruins felt badly used by that turn of events, I suppose you couldn't blame them. But would this one incident be enough to justify a major rule change such as this? We'll never know, because the Canadiens' reputation for scoring multiple goals on a single penalty was very well earned. In addition to the game on November 5:

  • October 5, 1955: Maurice Richard and Don Marshall score on the Bruins' Bob Armstong's penalty
  • December 1, 1955: Beliveau and Richard score on the Bruins' Vic Stasiuk's penalty
  • December 10, 1955: Bernie Geoffrion and Beliveau score on the Red Wings' Gord Hollingworth's penalty
  • December 20, 1955: Beliveau and Richard score on the Black Hawks' Gus Mortson's penalty
  • December 24, 1955: Richard and Ken Mosdell score on the Red Wings' Marty Pavelich's penalty
  • January 28, 1956: Beliveau and Richard score on the Bruins' Bob Armstrong's penalty
  • February 18, 1956: Beliveau and Richard score on the Rangers' Ivan Irwin's penalty

In total, Montreal scored a total of nine “extra” power-play goals in the 1955-56 season. As a comparison, only one team managed to score twice on the same minor penalty against Montreal, when the Maple Leafs pulled the trick on December 29, 1955. Clearly the idea that Montreal scored a great deal in this manner was well-supported.

So the reason for the rule change is clear, and was actually happening. But did the rule change have the desired effect? That is, did Montreal's advantage on the power-play come down in 1956-57? There are no official power-play statistics from this era, so I went ahead and compiled some myself. For the 1955-56 season, I decided to use the modern convention for major penalties, whereby scoring a goal starts a new power play opportunity. So on a power-play on which Montreal scored two goals, they would be credited as going two for three with the man advantage. For 1956-57, modern scoring conventions are used.

1955-56 NHL Power-Play Statistics

Team	 PPG	PPO	PP%
Montreal 63	342	18.4
Detroit	 52	339	15.3
New York 42	323	13.0
Boston	 40	319	12.5
Toronto	 33	338	 9.8
Chicago	 22	265	 8.3
Average	 42	321	13.1

1956/57 NHL Power-Play Statistics

Team	 PPG	PPO	PP%
Montreal 55	290	19.0
Detroit	 47	253	18.6
New York 48	260	18.5
Toronto	 42	258	16.3
Chicago	 33	238	13.9
Boston	 34	280	12.1
Average	 43	263	16.3

After the rule change, Montreal was still the best team in the league on the power-play, though their margin was far less. Not all of this change has to do with the new rule, though. A large part of it was due to the other teams in the league simply getting better with the man advantage. Taking out “extra” power-play goals in 1955-56, the league average power-play conversion rate was about 14%. In 1956-57 it was 16%.

Since we're on the subject, we may as well have a look at the power-play scoring leaders for these years as well. Here are some more numbers you've probably never seen before:

1955-56 NHL Power-Play Scoring Leaders

Player	         Team	Position GP	PPG	PPA	PPP
Jean Beliveau	 Mtl	C	 70	19	18	37
Gordie Howe	 Det	RW	 70	14	23	37
Maurice Richard	 Mtl	RW	 70	13	17	30
Red Kelly	 Det	D	 70	10	18	28
Bert Olmstead	 Mtl	LW	 70	 5	23	28
Doug Harvey	 Mtl	D	 62	 1	25	26
Bernie Geoffrion Mtl	RW	 59	11	13	24
Bill Gadsby	 NYR	D	 70	 3	20	23
Ted Lindsay	 Det	LW	 67	14	 8	22
Tod Sloan	 Tor	C	 70	10	11	21

1956-57 NHL Power-Play Scoring Leaders

Player	         Team	Position GP	PPG	PPA	PPP
Jean Beliveau	 Mtl	C	 69	12	19	31
Gordie Howe	 Det	RW	 70	14	16	30
Andy Bathgate	 NYR	RW	 70	 6	20	26
Doug Harvey	 Mtl	D	 70	 2	24	26
Dickie Moore	 Mtl	LW	 70	14	 9	23
Ted Lindsay	 Det	LW	 70	 6	17	23
Maurice Richard	 Mtl	RW	 63	11	10	21
George Armstrong Tor	RW	 54	 8	11	19
Red Kelly	 Det	D	 70	 6	11	17
Doug Mohns	 Bos	D	 68	 2	15	17

Beliveau and Gordie Howe were the real power-play stars during these years, finishing one-two in man-advantage points in both years. The names on these lists are basically the players you expect to be there. But if we strip out the special-teams scoring and look only at even-strength points, you find some names you probably wouldn't have guessed would be there:

1955-56 NHL Even-Strength Scoring Leaders

Player	         Team	Position GP	ESG	ESA	ESP
Jean Beliveau	 Mtl	C	 70	28	22	50
Andy Bathgate	 NYR	RW	 70	12	37	49
Tod Sloan	 Tor	C	 70	27	18	45
Bert Olmstead	 Mtl	Lw	 70	9	33	42
Maurice Richard	 Mtl	RW	 70	25	16	41
Gordie Howe	 Det	RW	 70	24	17	41
Dean Prentice	 NYR	LW	 70	24	16	40
Bernie Geoffrion Mtl	RW	 70	18	20	38
Dave Creighton	 NYR	C	 70	15	23	38
Larry Popein	 NYR	C	 64	14	24	38

1956-57 NHL Even-Strength Scoring Leaders

Player	        Team	Position GP	ESG	ESA	ESP
Ted Lindsay	Det	LW	 70	23	38	61
Gordie Howe	Det	RW	 70	30	28	58
Jean Beliveau	Mtl	C	 69	21	32	53
Don McKenney	Bos	C	 69	18	35	53
Ed Litzenberger	Chi	RW	 70	28	22	50
Andy Bathgate	NYR	RW	 70	19	30	49
Real Chevrefils	Bos	LW	 70	26	16	42
Leo Labine	Bos	RW	 67	17	25	42
Maurice Richard	Mtl	RW	 63	22	19	41
Henri Richard	Mtl	C	 63	15	24	39

Even though Beliveau score more power-play points than anyone, he was anything but a man-advantage opportunist. He put up 103 even-strength points, tops in the league, beating Howe by four points and Andy Bathgate by five.

The two Boston wingers in 1956-57 are the real surprises on these lists. Real Chevrefils, he of 104 career NHL goals, was third in even-strength goals. Leo Labine put up only 321 career NHL points, but was in the top 10 in even-strength scoring here. Oddly, Boston's second line (Fleming Mackell, Vic Stasiuk, and Johnny Peirson) was their primary man-advantage unit, at least in terms of points. Neither line had any real success on the power-play, which kept their point totals down.

These leaderboards illustrate a point that still applies today; much of the best players' scoring opportunities come on the power-play, which exaggerates the difference between their abilities and the abilities of players who receive less man-advantage time. This is especially true of defenseman, both then and now.

0 comments have been left for this article.

<< Previous Article
Howe and Why (07/13)
<< Previous Column
Up and Coming (07/07)
Next Column >>
Up and Coming (07/19)
Next Article >>
Up and Coming (07/19)

RECENTLY AT HOCKEY PROSPECTUS
Top 100 Draft Prospects 2013: 31-40
Top 100 Draft Prospects 2013: 21-30
Top 100 Draft Prospects 2013: 16-20
NHL Playoffs, Second Round: Boston Bruins vs...
Premium Article Conn Smythe Watch: Lundqvist Leads


MORE BY IAIN FYFFE
2010-10-19 - Premium Article Up and Coming: The Inductinator on Defenseme...
2010-10-14 - Up and Coming: Drafting The Moneypuck Way
2010-07-19 - Up and Coming: “Too Small for the NHL” is a ...
2010-07-15 - Up and Coming: Pucks From the Past- The Mont...
2010-07-07 - Up and Coming: Inductinator: All-Star Teams
2010-06-28 - Up and Coming: Thoughts On The 2010 NHL Entr...
2010-06-23 - Up and Coming: CHLers and USHLers at the 201...
More...

MORE UP AND COMING
2010-10-19 - Premium Article Up and Coming: The Inductinator on Defenseme...
2010-10-14 - Up and Coming: Drafting The Moneypuck Way
2010-07-19 - Up and Coming: “Too Small for the NHL” is a ...
2010-07-15 - Up and Coming: Pucks From the Past- The Mont...
2010-07-07 - Up and Coming: Inductinator: All-Star Teams
2010-06-28 - Up and Coming: Thoughts On The 2010 NHL Entr...
2010-06-23 - Up and Coming: CHLers and USHLers at the 201...
More...